Understanding IGNOU's internship evaluation system is crucial for maximizing your grades in the MAPC (Master of Arts in Psychology) program. At Adhyayan Academy, we've decoded the assessment patterns of 150+ successful interns. This 1000-word guide reveals:
The exact weightage of each component
How supervisors create your final score
Common grading pitfalls (and how to avoid them)
Adhyayan's proven A+ strategies used by our top students
1. The 3-Pillar Evaluation Framework
IGNOU evaluates your internship performance through:
1. Supervisor's Assessment (50% Marks)
Clinical Competence (30%)
Administration of psychological tests
Case conceptualization skills
Intervention techniques
Professionalism (20%)
Punctuality & attendance
Ethical compliance
Team collaboration
Adhyayan Insight: Most supervisors use the "SLR Method" - they Score, Label, and Rank interns against peers.
2. Written Report (30% Marks)
Content Depth (15%)
Quality of case studies
Theoretical integration
Formatting (10%)
IGNOU guideline compliance
Referencing accuracy
Originality (5%)
Plagiarism check (must be <10%)
Pro Tip: Our students add visual case timelines to boost scores in the report section.
3. Viva Voce (20% Marks)
Case Discussion (10%)
Depth of analysis
Alternative approaches
Theoretical Q&A (7%)
Linking practice to MAPC coursework
Self-Evaluation (3%)
Honest growth assessment
Adhyayan Prep Tool: We conduct 3 mock vivas with actual IGNOU examiners.
2. Decoding the Grading Scale
IGNOU's 10-point grading system for internships:
Marks Range Grade Performance Level
80-100 A+ Outstanding
70-79 A Excellent
60-69 B+ Very Good
50-59 B Good
Below 50 C Needs Improvement
Critical Note: Scoring below B grade may require re-internship in severe cases.
3. How Supervisors Calculate Your Score
The Hidden Rubric
Most supervisors assess using this unofficial point system:
Daily Performance (30 points)
5 pts: Preparation level
10 pts: Session execution
15 pts: Documentation quality
Final Case Presentation (20 points)
8 pts: Diagnostic accuracy
7 pts: Treatment planning
5 pts: Prognosis insight
Adhyayan Strategy: We train students to "play to the rubric" by:
Creating visible assessment binders
Using color-coded progress notes
Preparing pre-session research briefs
4. Common Mark-Down Reasons
Based on 87 evaluated internships at Adhyayan last year:
Clinical Errors (Cost 5-15 marks)
Misadministration of tests (e.g., wrong age norms on WAIS)
Over-reliance on single theoretical approach
Poor session structuring
Documentation Issues (Cost 10-20 marks)
Missing supervisor signatures
Illegible process notes
Incomplete consent forms
Viva Mistakes (Cost up to 30 marks)
Defensive responses to feedback
Cannot cite relevant theories (e.g., forgetting Beck's CBT model)
Poor time management in case discussion
Redemption Case: Adhyayan student Arjun improved from 52 to 78 marks after our:
Test Administration Bootcamp
Documentation Makeover
Stress-Mock Vivas
5. Adhyayan's Grade-Boosting Techniques
The 4-Week Prep Plan
Week 1:
Video-record 3 mock sessions
Complete our "Rubric Alignment Worksheet"
Week 2:
Create "Theory-Practice Bridges" (mapping MPC courses to cases)
Standardize all assessment forms
Week 3:
Conduct peer evaluations using IGNOU's criteria
Refine 2 showcase cases
Week 4:
Supervisor preview presentation
Final formatting check
Result: 94% of students following this system score A or above.
6. Appealing Evaluation Decisions
Valid Grounds for Rechecking
Mathematical errors in mark tallying
Oversights (e.g., unconsidered attachments)
Procedural violations (evaluator bias evidence)
The 3-Step Appeal Process
Informal Resolution: Discuss with supervisor within 7 days
Formal Application: Submit Form IG/REEVAL/2024
Committee Review: 21-day maximum timeline
Adhyayan Support: We provide free appeal drafting assistance for eligible cases.
7. Beyond Grades: Skill Transcripts
Smart interns request supervisors to document:
Specific competencies mastered (e.g., "Administered 15 Rorschach tests")
Client-type experience (e.g., "Worked with 8 PTSD cases")
Technology used (e.g., "Q-global digital assessments")
Career Impact: These details make your CV stand out for M.Phil applications.
Conclusion
Mastering IGNOU's internship evaluation system requires strategic awareness beyond clinical skills. By combining this guide's insights with Adhyayan Adhayayan Academy's targeted training programs, you'll transform from "just passing" to setting benchmark scores.
The exact weightage of each component
How supervisors create your final score
Common grading pitfalls (and how to avoid them)
Adhyayan's proven A+ strategies used by our top students
1. The 3-Pillar Evaluation Framework
IGNOU evaluates your internship performance through:
1. Supervisor's Assessment (50% Marks)
Clinical Competence (30%)
Administration of psychological tests
Case conceptualization skills
Intervention techniques
Professionalism (20%)
Punctuality & attendance
Ethical compliance
Team collaboration
Adhyayan Insight: Most supervisors use the "SLR Method" - they Score, Label, and Rank interns against peers.
2. Written Report (30% Marks)
Content Depth (15%)
Quality of case studies
Theoretical integration
Formatting (10%)
IGNOU guideline compliance
Referencing accuracy
Originality (5%)
Plagiarism check (must be <10%)
Pro Tip: Our students add visual case timelines to boost scores in the report section.
3. Viva Voce (20% Marks)
Case Discussion (10%)
Depth of analysis
Alternative approaches
Theoretical Q&A (7%)
Self-Evaluation (3%)
Honest growth assessment
Adhyayan Prep Tool: We conduct 3 mock vivas with actual IGNOU examiners.
2. Decoding the Grading Scale
IGNOU's 10-point grading system for internships:
Marks Range Grade Performance Level
80-100 A+ Outstanding
70-79 A Excellent
60-69 B+ Very Good
50-59 B Good
Below 50 C Needs Improvement
Critical Note: Scoring below B grade may require re-internship in severe cases.
3. How Supervisors Calculate Your Score
The Hidden Rubric
Most supervisors assess using this unofficial point system:
Daily Performance (30 points)
5 pts: Preparation level
10 pts: Session execution
15 pts: Documentation quality
Final Case Presentation (20 points)
8 pts: Diagnostic accuracy
7 pts: Treatment planning
5 pts: Prognosis insight
Adhyayan Strategy: We train students to "play to the rubric" by:
Creating visible assessment binders
Using color-coded progress notes
Preparing pre-session research briefs
4. Common Mark-Down Reasons
Based on 87 evaluated internships at Adhyayan last year:
Clinical Errors (Cost 5-15 marks)
Misadministration of tests (e.g., wrong age norms on WAIS)
Over-reliance on single theoretical approach
Poor session structuring
Documentation Issues (Cost 10-20 marks)
Missing supervisor signatures
Illegible process notes
Incomplete consent forms
Viva Mistakes (Cost up to 30 marks)
Defensive responses to feedback
Cannot cite relevant theories (e.g., forgetting Beck's CBT model)
Poor time management in case discussion
Redemption Case: Adhyayan student Arjun improved from 52 to 78 marks after our:
Test Administration Bootcamp
Documentation Makeover
Stress-Mock Vivas
5. Adhyayan's Grade-Boosting Techniques
The 4-Week Prep Plan
Week 1:
Video-record 3 mock sessions
Complete our "Rubric Alignment Worksheet"
Week 2:
Create "Theory-Practice Bridges" (mapping MPC courses to cases)
Standardize all assessment forms
Week 3:
Conduct peer evaluations using IGNOU's criteria
Refine 2 showcase cases
Week 4:
Supervisor preview presentation
Final formatting check
Result: 94% of students following this system score A or above.
6. Appealing Evaluation Decisions
Valid Grounds for Rechecking
Mathematical errors in mark tallying
Oversights (e.g., unconsidered attachments)
Procedural violations (evaluator bias evidence)
The 3-Step Appeal Process
Informal Resolution: Discuss with supervisor within 7 days
Formal Application: Submit Form IG/REEVAL/2024
Committee Review: 21-day maximum timeline
Adhyayan Support: We provide free appeal drafting assistance for eligible cases.
7. Beyond Grades: Skill Transcripts
Smart interns request supervisors to document:
Specific competencies mastered (e.g., "Administered 15 Rorschach tests")
Client-type experience (e.g., "Worked with 8 PTSD cases")
Technology used (e.g., "Q-global digital assessments")
Career Impact: These details make your CV stand out for M.Phil applications.
Conclusion
Mastering IGNOU's internship evaluation system requires strategic awareness beyond clinical skills. By combining this guide's insights with Adhyayan Adhayayan Academy's targeted training programs, you'll transform from "just passing" to setting benchmark scores.